Difference between revisions of "Week 1 Questions/Comments-327 11"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
(Gisela Bock, "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History")
(Alexander)
Line 68: Line 68:
  
 
I found it very interesting that Alexander felt that most women would put race before gender, in how they identify themselves. As she said in her essay "..although Black women's experiences may be gender, they are shaped most compellingly by their role as members of the Black community." This also fed into her discussion of the importance of looking at the history of Black women separately from that of white women's. She made it clear that it is impossible for gender to "privilege" over race. It is interesting that in Haulman's essay, she mentions so often the "bonds of womanhood" and how women are brought together by the experiences they share, but in Alexanders essay, she seems to reject the idea that ALL women can be linked together, but that only certain groups of women can be bonded.  --Grace Christenson
 
I found it very interesting that Alexander felt that most women would put race before gender, in how they identify themselves. As she said in her essay "..although Black women's experiences may be gender, they are shaped most compellingly by their role as members of the Black community." This also fed into her discussion of the importance of looking at the history of Black women separately from that of white women's. She made it clear that it is impossible for gender to "privilege" over race. It is interesting that in Haulman's essay, she mentions so often the "bonds of womanhood" and how women are brought together by the experiences they share, but in Alexanders essay, she seems to reject the idea that ALL women can be linked together, but that only certain groups of women can be bonded.  --Grace Christenson
 +
 +
Like Grace pointed out, I also was struck by Alexander challenging the idea of homogeneity within the scope of women's studies. The identification that the term "woman" inherently refers to a "white woman" was a significant point made in the essay that makes it necessary to be "truly willing to explore difference" between white women and black women (pg. 23). But when scholars choose to study black women exclusively through the lens of race, the voices of these women are slowly being silenced because only one aspect of their identity is being acknowledged. --Ellen Smethurst

Revision as of 12:49, 1 September 2011