Difference between revisions of "325--2011--Week 4 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→Danly, RR in American Art) |
(→Arthur McEvoy, “Working Environments: An Ecological Approach to Industrial Health and Safety”) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
McEvoy was trying to make you understand in his writings that people only saw the capitalism in the industrial areas. The people during this time didn’t think about what the factories and mills would do to the landscape, they just knew it meant money in their pockets. I wonder if the people who lived around these areas were having problems getting clean water or breathing clean air? Of course accidents would happen, but because factories were more concerned in making money people’s health suffered. Why did it take so long for these factories to understand that a person’s health or life is more important? ---Pam Petzold | McEvoy was trying to make you understand in his writings that people only saw the capitalism in the industrial areas. The people during this time didn’t think about what the factories and mills would do to the landscape, they just knew it meant money in their pockets. I wonder if the people who lived around these areas were having problems getting clean water or breathing clean air? Of course accidents would happen, but because factories were more concerned in making money people’s health suffered. Why did it take so long for these factories to understand that a person’s health or life is more important? ---Pam Petzold | ||
| + | |||
| + | In The Workplace as an Ecological System, McEvoy points out two important things that caught my attention. The first stresses the role the worker’s body plays as the biological core the ecological system in the workplace. The relationship between people who work and the technology they operate is complex. Companies need workers to operate their machinery, but this also requires that workers will be safe while working, as McEvoy points out “the constancy of the body’s vulnerability to injury even as technology changes,” (74). The second aspect of McEvoy’s essay was the role of technology in the ecological system. Technology plays an important role in shaping people’s consciousness of occupational hazard by laying out the boundaries between injuries that society perceives as preventable, as inevitable costs of economic like, or as no injury at all. Therefore, as the worker’s body is at the core of the ecological system in the workplace, technology structures it. McEvoy explains that technology does this in three ways: “by posing hazards directly, by shaping the social organization that exposes workers to risk, and by influencing society’s awareness of danger to its working population,” (79). To support this McEvoy references the Farwell vs. Boston and Worcester Railroad case in 1842, in which a worker Nicholas Farwell lost his arm when a locomotive derailed. During this trial McEvoy mentions “the three great common-law defenses” available to the defendant: assumption of risk, the fellow servant rule, and the rule that any contributory negligence on the part of the injured plaintiff was an absolute bar to recovery. Together, the three defenses shielded employers from nearly all liability for work injuries, thus granting them near-absolute authority to control the pace and conditions of work. | ||
| + | << Mike R. >> | ||
== Edison Bowers, “Ís It Safe to Work? A Study of Industrial Accidents” == | == Edison Bowers, “Ís It Safe to Work? A Study of Industrial Accidents” == | ||
