Difference between revisions of "329-2010--Week 10 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comments on the reading versus the movie)
(Things the movie got right)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
There is definitely a gap between the wage earners and the employers.  Baldwin-Felts’ men drive around town in a fancy car (which some of the townspeople say is disturbing the hunting).  They dress in expensive suits and treat the people of Matewan with extreme haughtiness and disrespect.  Griggs and Hickey were especially disrespectful to Elma Radnor who was their host in town.  I really liked Joe Kenehan’s speech about unions when he said that there is no skilled or unskilled and race does not matter; that’s what a union is.  (It reminded me of the meeting in the beginning of The Patriot, especially since Chris Cooper was in that film as well.)  Though I did wonder what labor union Kenehan is a member of, I do not believe it is mentioned in the film.  Is he supposed to be a member of the UMWA?  The movie also accurately shows the use of company script for items at the company store and the housing that is provided by the company. One side note, the director, John Sayles, appears in the movie as well as a preacher.
 
There is definitely a gap between the wage earners and the employers.  Baldwin-Felts’ men drive around town in a fancy car (which some of the townspeople say is disturbing the hunting).  They dress in expensive suits and treat the people of Matewan with extreme haughtiness and disrespect.  Griggs and Hickey were especially disrespectful to Elma Radnor who was their host in town.  I really liked Joe Kenehan’s speech about unions when he said that there is no skilled or unskilled and race does not matter; that’s what a union is.  (It reminded me of the meeting in the beginning of The Patriot, especially since Chris Cooper was in that film as well.)  Though I did wonder what labor union Kenehan is a member of, I do not believe it is mentioned in the film.  Is he supposed to be a member of the UMWA?  The movie also accurately shows the use of company script for items at the company store and the housing that is provided by the company. One side note, the director, John Sayles, appears in the movie as well as a preacher.
 
–Samantha W.
 
–Samantha W.
 +
 +
Samantha, I think at one point Kenehan mentions that he was a member of the Wobblies. I don't know if UMWA was the other union he ended up joining. I think the movie accurately represented the ways in which the mining company "owned the town". In the movie, some of the people who represented the company, like the Hickey and Griggs, claimed that the company owned all the property in the town including the houses they were trying to evict the family from. In the beginning, a man was running down a list of things the company "provided" the new workers, however all the expenses for things like the train ride were deducted from their pay anyway. The workers and people who lived in the town were also expected to buy food and products from the company store yet they jacked up the prices so the people could barely afford to survive. Elma Radnor also mentions to Kenehan that fires in the mine caused by the coal dust could potentially be avoided if the company would pay to water down the walls, but she said the company wouldn't because it was too expensive.  -Amy Van Ness
  
 
== Things the movie got wrong ==
 
== Things the movie got wrong ==

Revision as of 03:14, 27 October 2010