Difference between revisions of "328--Week 1 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
Line 44: Line 44:
  
 
In her essay, "Rethinking the Position of Black Women in American Women's History," Leslie Alexander makes a statement near the end saying, "The challenge remains for us to analyze Black women through their own eyes rather than through the lens of whiteness and opression." (p.22).  My question, is does anyone think that is truly possible?  Most of what scholars have on Black women's history has been recorded by whites, and for a great deal of time, by white men.  I believe that now we as historians should be able to look at this history through the eyes of those who experienced it, but a large chunk of this history has been warped and skewed in some way.  Does anyone think it's possible to correct that?  Or, regardless of the tools and resources we have today, are things always going to be interpreted in a more biased sense than they should be?  -Kelly Wuyscik
 
In her essay, "Rethinking the Position of Black Women in American Women's History," Leslie Alexander makes a statement near the end saying, "The challenge remains for us to analyze Black women through their own eyes rather than through the lens of whiteness and opression." (p.22).  My question, is does anyone think that is truly possible?  Most of what scholars have on Black women's history has been recorded by whites, and for a great deal of time, by white men.  I believe that now we as historians should be able to look at this history through the eyes of those who experienced it, but a large chunk of this history has been warped and skewed in some way.  Does anyone think it's possible to correct that?  Or, regardless of the tools and resources we have today, are things always going to be interpreted in a more biased sense than they should be?  -Kelly Wuyscik
 +
 +
I found it extremely interesting in "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History" that motherhood was a natural phenomenon, however fatherhood was not seen as a natural at all. That was seen as social. Yet for women being a mother was a "natural" phenomenon. I have always assumed that fatherhood was a natural phenomenon like motherhood despite their involvement in the social sphere. The child is just as much apart of him as it is the mother. My question is if this is because men were so involved in society there wasn't time? Or was it the fact that he could not show his nurturing/loving side? -- Amanda Taub

Revision as of 22:42, 16 January 2008