Difference between revisions of "328 2010--Week 13 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
m ()
()
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
Many of these women had similar life experiences regarding their role in the latter half of the 20th century.  What I found fascinating was that the women that had children at an early age often sought a career after their children were older.  These women found a second life at the age of 40 or 45 in which they had raised their family and now had the opportunity and freedom to pursue their dreams.  Additionally, these women have the benefit of life experiences which would affect their choices for the future.  The professional women who had gone to college right from high school often waited to their late 20's or early 30's to start a family and then were either forced to choose between their career or their kids; or to put their children into daycare.  They are also more financially secure and stable than the women who married at a young age.  Who's to say which option is better.  Women, unlike men in society, are forced to be put in the position of making these decisions and living with any ramifications. - EFritz
 
Many of these women had similar life experiences regarding their role in the latter half of the 20th century.  What I found fascinating was that the women that had children at an early age often sought a career after their children were older.  These women found a second life at the age of 40 or 45 in which they had raised their family and now had the opportunity and freedom to pursue their dreams.  Additionally, these women have the benefit of life experiences which would affect their choices for the future.  The professional women who had gone to college right from high school often waited to their late 20's or early 30's to start a family and then were either forced to choose between their career or their kids; or to put their children into daycare.  They are also more financially secure and stable than the women who married at a young age.  Who's to say which option is better.  Women, unlike men in society, are forced to be put in the position of making these decisions and living with any ramifications. - EFritz
 +
 +
So, reading through a couple of these papers, I started to notice a trend around the third paper of women who were being (what is recognized today as) oppressed, but never really felt that it was that much of an issue to them. By that I mean, most of these women recognized that "women" in general were not permitted the same opportunity as men, but that it wouldn't affect them (Holman’s paper even says “Although she never felt restricted from any job she desired, she did observe that there were only so many positions open to women.8” which I think perfectly exemplifies my point). And of these women, I have to say, it seems to have produced a biased opinion that it worked out for every woman. I feel like these women in particular were very successful in their lives. They are now fairly old, have lived a long life, and seem to not fret and worry about the money or other particulars in their lives now. Maybe their life wasn't always easy, but it still says something that they made it to be over the age of 55. I think sometimes it is forgotten that that is a huge life accomplishment, to be old. I think it also may have been to the benefit of these women to ignore the fact that the oppression of women may affect them, because if they ignore it, then they can surpass it. As all of the women who are mentioned in the 4 papers, (Holman, Brau, Whiteaker, Makarios) in particular that I noticed this trend of not noticing the oppression of themselves in, have done. It also really surprises me that no one above me seemed to have noticed this.    –ssellers

Revision as of 02:28, 16 April 2010