Difference between revisions of "328 2010--Week 4 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→Chapter 4—Feminists, Anarchists, and Other Rebel Girls) |
(→Linda Gordon, “Black and White Visions of Welfare: Women’s Welfare Activism, 1890-1945,”) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Linda Gordon, “Black and White Visions of Welfare: Women’s Welfare Activism, 1890-1945,” == | == Linda Gordon, “Black and White Visions of Welfare: Women’s Welfare Activism, 1890-1945,” == | ||
| + | |||
| + | On page 23 Linda Gordon states that "Black welfare reformers were more concerned to combine the development of protective institutions for women with an antirape discourse. Among whites, rape was not an important topic of discussion during this period, and in protective work for women and girls, male sexuality was treated as natural and irrepressible" and I understand that the times were completely different but how did society of the time use this to justify rape? Infidelity and Adultery I could possibly understand this being used, but not rape. She even uses the word "girls" which to me suggests children. Was it still okay then? From the rest of the document by Linda Gordon I also take it that everything that is wrong with the welfare reform system today was put in place by the white reformers--Maybe they should have left the social work up to the Black reformers? -Ssellers | ||
== Judy Yung, The Social Awakening of Chinese American Women as Reported in ''Chung Sai Yat Po'', 1900-1911 == | == Judy Yung, The Social Awakening of Chinese American Women as Reported in ''Chung Sai Yat Po'', 1900-1911 == | ||
