Difference between revisions of "426--Week 13 Questions/Comments--Thursday"
From McClurken Wiki
(→Irish American Family) |
(→Working Class Families) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I've always thought this was interesting, that even though the family needs the money and needs things to get done, they still have strict gender divisions. As quoted on page 103 of Stephanie Coontz article, "World-class families did accept a clear division of labor on the basis of gender, however, and often formulated it in terms of domesticity." However, I also liked that she included (even if a lot later in the article) that when the housewife was sick, the husband or males or children had to take on the 'women's work' because there were no servants or anyone else to do it. --Ashley Wilkins | I've always thought this was interesting, that even though the family needs the money and needs things to get done, they still have strict gender divisions. As quoted on page 103 of Stephanie Coontz article, "World-class families did accept a clear division of labor on the basis of gender, however, and often formulated it in terms of domesticity." However, I also liked that she included (even if a lot later in the article) that when the housewife was sick, the husband or males or children had to take on the 'women's work' because there were no servants or anyone else to do it. --Ashley Wilkins | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's interesting how Coontz made parallels between ethnicities and also classes. Still it seems that ethnic divisions were very prominent even during the labor movement. The working class family ties in with our recent discussions of childlessness and the importance of children in families. The working class families knew that child wage earners were critical and they must have circumvented child labor laws. I was also surprised to read about the conditions of the women: that immigrants were still hauling water in many cases.--Amanda | ||
