Difference between revisions of "329--Week 15 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→6 Overall Comments on Movie) |
(→6 Overall Comments on Movie) |
||
| Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
If this movie was not the most historically accurate we've examined in this class, I believe it was at least the most effective. It's errors, where they occur, are slight and do not detract from the telling of a historical event. After some of the ridiculous at portraying history we have seen throughout the semester, I am tremendously impressed by All The President's Men. I would have been tempted to watch it two or three times just in the last two days, mistakes significant enough to negatively effect the film's ability to tell it's story. As long as we take this story as a small piece of a greater event, this movie is incredible. - JT Newcomb | If this movie was not the most historically accurate we've examined in this class, I believe it was at least the most effective. It's errors, where they occur, are slight and do not detract from the telling of a historical event. After some of the ridiculous at portraying history we have seen throughout the semester, I am tremendously impressed by All The President's Men. I would have been tempted to watch it two or three times just in the last two days, mistakes significant enough to negatively effect the film's ability to tell it's story. As long as we take this story as a small piece of a greater event, this movie is incredible. - JT Newcomb | ||
| + | |||
| + | I enjoyed the movie; I think it was pretty accurate in describing how Woodward and Bernstein were able to prove the Watergate Scandal. For me it was one of those movies I need to see twice to really get the full understanding of it because there are some many hints and characters they showed in the film. –Ashley Scutari | ||
== Comments on Reading in ''Reel History'' == | == Comments on Reading in ''Reel History'' == | ||
