Difference between revisions of "329--Week 4 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
Srichardson (Talk | contribs) (→4 Public reaction/impact) |
|||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
This was the first R Rated film I was allowed to see in the theater. So of course at the time I thought it was totally rad, what with the cannonball and tomahawk scenes. But I also remember the History Channel doing a round table discussion over its historical merits or lack thereof. And in this program I think I remember the panel pretty much eviscerating its historical accuracy, but I could be wrong. -Bryan Mull | This was the first R Rated film I was allowed to see in the theater. So of course at the time I thought it was totally rad, what with the cannonball and tomahawk scenes. But I also remember the History Channel doing a round table discussion over its historical merits or lack thereof. And in this program I think I remember the panel pretty much eviscerating its historical accuracy, but I could be wrong. -Bryan Mull | ||
| − | I snuck into this movie when I was 13 and even then I was struck by its many similarities to another Mel Gibson movie about freedom and all that jazz: Braveheart. It all starts with the mean English throwing their weight around, oppressing the poor Scots/Americans. An upstanding man, William Wallace/Benjamin Martin, resists entering the conflict until his secret wife/son is brutally murdered by an English lord/colonel. Wallace/Martin then leads a motley crew of locals and raises hell. Hilarity ensues when the Scots moon their opponents on the battlefield/the militia make fake British officers to fool Cornwallis. Eventually, the Scots/Americans defeat the English. The difference is in the ending: Benjamin Martin lives on to return to his paradise plantation of equality and brotherly love, while William Wallace is executed in one of modern cinema's most famous scenes. Apologies if I ruined the end of Braveheart because you've been living under a rock for 15 years. - Sarah Richardson | + | I snuck into this movie when I was 13 and even then I was struck by its many similarities to another Mel Gibson movie about freedom and all that jazz: Braveheart. It all starts with the mean English throwing their weight around, oppressing the poor Scots/Americans. An upstanding man with a tragic past, William Wallace/Benjamin Martin, resists entering the conflict until his secret wife/son is brutally murdered by an English lord/colonel. Wallace/Martin then leads a motley crew of locals and raises hell. Hilarity ensues when the Scots moon their opponents on the battlefield/the militia make fake British officers to fool Cornwallis. Eventually, the Scots/Americans defeat the English. The difference is in the ending: Benjamin Martin lives on to return to his paradise plantation of equality and brotherly love, while William Wallace is executed in one of modern cinema's most famous scenes. Apologies if I ruined the end of Braveheart because you've been living under a rock for 15 years. - Sarah Richardson |
== 5 Overall == | == 5 Overall == | ||
