Difference between revisions of "329--Week 3 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→1b Inaccurate/issues:) |
(→1a Right:) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
The mindset that the land was for the taking (by England). The movie also managed the 'superiority complex' of the British army towards the colonist militia. The costuming and makeup departments seem to have been able to get the 'look' of the Mohican as compared to the picture shown to us in class on Tuesday. --Ashley Wilkins | The mindset that the land was for the taking (by England). The movie also managed the 'superiority complex' of the British army towards the colonist militia. The costuming and makeup departments seem to have been able to get the 'look' of the Mohican as compared to the picture shown to us in class on Tuesday. --Ashley Wilkins | ||
| + | |||
| + | A far as the historical accuracy of the films is concerned, I was pleased to read in the articles that Indian adoptions of colonists were actually practiced. This at least means the basis of Nathaniel as adopted is sound. – Wesley Weeks | ||
== 1b Inaccurate/issues: == | == 1b Inaccurate/issues: == | ||
