Difference between revisions of "HIST 131--Week 9 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_lines is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1166

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_line is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1167

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_group is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1168

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_tag is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1169

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_lines is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1166

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_line is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1167

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_group is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1168

Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property _HWLDF_WordAccumulator::$_tag is deprecated in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/diff/DairikiDiff.php on line 1169
Line 13: Line 13:
 
Wendover states, "...it was left for Americans to convince the potentates of Europe, that the end of all just governemnts was the happiness of the governed," (184). It seems to me that he is describing anarchy here, yet he is in favor of American governmment policies and the constitution. How was this contradiction formed? ---Laura Peters
 
Wendover states, "...it was left for Americans to convince the potentates of Europe, that the end of all just governemnts was the happiness of the governed," (184). It seems to me that he is describing anarchy here, yet he is in favor of American governmment policies and the constitution. How was this contradiction formed? ---Laura Peters
  
In this reading, when Wendover saya, "...Not inured to the tactics of war, untaught in the practice of barbarity, not accustomed to the clang of arms, America trembles; all awake to foreboding fears.  All alarmed at the clouds that thicken, Americans collect.  The crisis is truly distressing-Death is a terror, but slavery is death."  This statement was very interesting because it appears that many find the situation of slavery problematic and upsetting, but yet they view it as a terror.  At this point it is implied that slavery is viewed as terror because it is new to many of the colonists; is this true?  However, it is also implying that everyone feels trapped by slavery.  Which is more likely, the feeling of entrapment or the fact that is just fear of a new concept?  Quincey Garcia   
+
In this reading, when Wendover saya, "...Not inured to the tactics of war, untaught in the practice of barbarity, not accustomed to the clang of arms, America trembles; all awake to foreboding fears.  All alarmed at the clouds that thicken, Americans collect.  The crisis is truly distressing-Death is a terror, but slavery is death."(183) This statement was very interesting because it appears that many find the situation of slavery problematic and upsetting, but yet they view it as a terror.  At this point it is implied that slavery is viewed as terror because it is new to many of the colonists; is this true?  However, it is also implying that everyone feels trapped by slavery.  Which is more likely, the feeling of entrapment or the fact that is just fear of a new concept?  Quincey Garcia   
  
 
== James Forten protests 1813 PA Law  ==
 
== James Forten protests 1813 PA Law  ==
Line 43: Line 43:
  
 
In this document, Jefferson states, "When they withdraw themselves to the culture of a small piece of land, they will perceive how useless to them are their extensive forests..." (189). Was Jefferson, who is usually held in high regards as brilliant, really so ignorant to think that Indians would be content contained on a small piece of land, while their forests, in a sense, their livelihood, are being settled by Americans? ---Laura Peters
 
In this document, Jefferson states, "When they withdraw themselves to the culture of a small piece of land, they will perceive how useless to them are their extensive forests..." (189). Was Jefferson, who is usually held in high regards as brilliant, really so ignorant to think that Indians would be content contained on a small piece of land, while their forests, in a sense, their livelihood, are being settled by Americans? ---Laura Peters
 +
 +
In the Address to the Wolf and People of the Mandan Nation, I was impressed by the statement, "We are now your fathers; and you shall not lose by the change.  As soon as Spain had agreed to withdraw from all the waters of the Missouri and Mississippi, I felt the desire of becoming acquainted with all my red children beyond the Mississippi, and of uniting them with us as we have those on this side of that river, in the bonds of peace and friendship."(190)  This statement was very powerful for me because I felt that there was a true sincerity in living harmoniously with the Native Americans.  Do you think that Indians appreciated this gesture, or do you think that they were concerned with the line, "We are now your fathers;"(190), since they were avoiding the empowerment by the whites?  Quincey Garcia
  
 
== Meriwether Lewis Journal, 1805 ==
 
== Meriwether Lewis Journal, 1805 ==

Revision as of 02:28, 21 March 2008