Difference between revisions of "Week 10 Questions/Comments-327 11"
From McClurken Wiki
(→Sarah Haynesworth Gayle, “An Alabama Diary,” 1828, 1833) |
(→Angelina Grimke Weld ''The Cruel Mistress'' -- 1839) |
||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
Hypocrisy abounds in Weld's description of a slave-owning mistress and how she treats her slaves yet maintains her role as a religious woman in the Charleston community. The justification that it was a slave's "duty to abide in abject submission" is another reflection of the cruel slave society. --Ellen S. | Hypocrisy abounds in Weld's description of a slave-owning mistress and how she treats her slaves yet maintains her role as a religious woman in the Charleston community. The justification that it was a slave's "duty to abide in abject submission" is another reflection of the cruel slave society. --Ellen S. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I totally agree with Ellen's idea of hypocrisy dominating the contents of this reading. When the passage talks about how "for many years, one or other, and often more of her slaves were flogged every day," one has to question how Weld was able to continue to believe "herself a paragon of religious piety." Even though Weld clearly sees her slaves as "belongings," it still amazes me that she was able to perpetrate these beatings and other cruelties on a regular basis and still she herself as the very definition of a good christian woman. --Grace C. | ||
We always mention the reasoning behind slavery and how Christianity "supported" it. But even with a different mentality from now and back in the time of Angelina Gimke Weld (1839), how could one explain that the same place for prayer and worship, was the same place for punishment (an inhumane and cruel punishment at that). I found it so mind boggling that she "order brothers to whip their own sisters and sisters their own brother, and yet no woman visited among the poor more than she did, or gave more liberally to relieve their wants." (216) I understand slavery was acceptable, but this torture and punishment is almost inexplicable. -Aqsa Z. | We always mention the reasoning behind slavery and how Christianity "supported" it. But even with a different mentality from now and back in the time of Angelina Gimke Weld (1839), how could one explain that the same place for prayer and worship, was the same place for punishment (an inhumane and cruel punishment at that). I found it so mind boggling that she "order brothers to whip their own sisters and sisters their own brother, and yet no woman visited among the poor more than she did, or gave more liberally to relieve their wants." (216) I understand slavery was acceptable, but this torture and punishment is almost inexplicable. -Aqsa Z. | ||
