Difference between revisions of "Week 8 Questions/Comments-327 11"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
(New England Divorce, CT, 1655-1678; MD, 1680)
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
I wondered how common divorce cases were, there are quite a few in the readings but how many more were there? Did women wait to file for divorce until they found another man willing to marry them I wonder? -- Emma C.
 
I wondered how common divorce cases were, there are quite a few in the readings but how many more were there? Did women wait to file for divorce until they found another man willing to marry them I wonder? -- Emma C.
 +
 +
After reading The Tennison Decision I was rather pleased with what the courts decision was.  Here was a man who admitted that yes he'd take his wife back home but could not love her.  How embarrassing would that have been to a woman (from any time period)??  If this was just a separation,did Elizabeth have to wait for John to die before moving on with her life? --Remy B.
  
 
== SC feme sole trader acts, 1712, 1744 ==
 
== SC feme sole trader acts, 1712, 1744 ==

Revision as of 13:39, 20 October 2011