Difference between revisions of "Week 3 Questions/Comments-327 11"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
(Benjamin Wadsworth, 1712 – Well-Ordered Family)
(Laws on Slave Descent in VA and MD, 1662, 1664, 1691, 1692)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
== Laws on Slave Descent in VA and MD, 1662, 1664, 1691, 1692 ==
 
== Laws on Slave Descent in VA and MD, 1662, 1664, 1691, 1692 ==
  
 +
It seems as if the laws in Virginia got harsher from 1662-1691 in regards to children being born to an Englishman/woman and a slave. In 1662, the child was free if the mother was free, but the child was a slave if the mother was a slave. The Christian Englishman/woman parent has to pay double the fines for committing the act. In 1991 if an English woman were to have a baby with a black man, she had to pay a fine one month after the child were born. The mother was taken into possession of the church for 5 years, but the child was taken for 30 years. I found that to be interesting. Why would a supposed Christian punish the child, especially worse than the mother was punished?  -- Ashley V.
  
 
== Skilled slaves in Maryland, 1748-1763, Maryland Gazette ==
 
== Skilled slaves in Maryland, 1748-1763, Maryland Gazette ==

Revision as of 00:48, 15 September 2011