Difference between revisions of "471A3--Week 14 Questions/Comments--Thursday"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Alright: McDonnell's first proclamation sounds like it was written by the UDC, and it was real wrong, but it it also sounds like it's something somebody would want to celebrate.  The most recent one is a little more complicated, a little more correct, but it sounds just a little schizophrenic.  I guess I think that maybe something like the history of the Confederacy is not the kind of thing a politician can use to promote tourism.  Not without being negligent. --Erin B.
 
Alright: McDonnell's first proclamation sounds like it was written by the UDC, and it was real wrong, but it it also sounds like it's something somebody would want to celebrate.  The most recent one is a little more complicated, a little more correct, but it sounds just a little schizophrenic.  I guess I think that maybe something like the history of the Confederacy is not the kind of thing a politician can use to promote tourism.  Not without being negligent. --Erin B.
 +
 +
I find it irritating that the governor uses the term "all Virginians" so often. All Virginians do not have a legacy of the Confederacy that they want to remember. Many of today's Virginians ancestors came after the Civil War or are not originally from Virginia to begin with. I also think that he is just further prompting the Lost Cause narrative when he says that the reason Confederate soldiers returned home was because of the "insurmountable numbers and resources" of the Union Army not just because they lost, fair and square. Basically, I think there is an enormous Lost Cause flavor to this that definitely does not represent "all Virginians." - Angie

Revision as of 03:06, 21 April 2011