Difference between revisions of "328--Week 2 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
After reading the article I made a decision that I had previously I had been flip-flopping between.  I now believe that there needs to be subcategories of the women's history to include at least, but not limiting to, African American Women's history.  The history seems to be so different just from the article we had to read.  Such as, the black women feeling that they were equally part of the vote that the black men casted.  I don't remember ever hearing about that before, at least with white women, but then again I haven't taken a women's history course before either -- Ashley Wilkins
 
After reading the article I made a decision that I had previously I had been flip-flopping between.  I now believe that there needs to be subcategories of the women's history to include at least, but not limiting to, African American Women's history.  The history seems to be so different just from the article we had to read.  Such as, the black women feeling that they were equally part of the vote that the black men casted.  I don't remember ever hearing about that before, at least with white women, but then again I haven't taken a women's history course before either -- Ashley Wilkins
 +
 +
I agree completely with Ashley.  After reading this article, it has become clear to me that women's history needs definite subcategories.  But that just makes me thing about how many subcategories can we really delve into?  I mean, if you think of how many different subject classes are offered to us within our history department, all of which normally pertain to "men's history," do we need all of those categories for women's history as well? - Kelly Wuyscik
  
 
The other thing I found interesting in the article by Elsa Brown was just how the women and men viewed the 'sense of the vote' at first.  Such as the vote casted by the men was equally the women's vote, and how the black republican politicians were able to get (well, it seems like the article was meaning quite a few) many of the black women to reject black male democratic voters.  Also, just the fact the black women to fight to even get to vote in Richmond's First African Baptist Church astounded me with the way the article was talking about community earlier on.  It definitely feels like slowly, but surely, the women were losing the political say they had through their men.  -- Ashley Wilkins
 
The other thing I found interesting in the article by Elsa Brown was just how the women and men viewed the 'sense of the vote' at first.  Such as the vote casted by the men was equally the women's vote, and how the black republican politicians were able to get (well, it seems like the article was meaning quite a few) many of the black women to reject black male democratic voters.  Also, just the fact the black women to fight to even get to vote in Richmond's First African Baptist Church astounded me with the way the article was talking about community earlier on.  It definitely feels like slowly, but surely, the women were losing the political say they had through their men.  -- Ashley Wilkins

Revision as of 01:54, 24 January 2008