Difference between revisions of "471A3--Week 9 Questions/Comments--Thursday"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Faust states that "nearly a century has failed to resolve debate about the war's impact on women, but the centrality of this question to the concerns of contemporary feminism suggest that it is unlikely to be abandoned as a framework for viewing women's experiences between 1861 and 1865." (239).  What types historiography do you think will appear in the future surrounding women's roles during the Civil War?  -ABratchie
 
Faust states that "nearly a century has failed to resolve debate about the war's impact on women, but the centrality of this question to the concerns of contemporary feminism suggest that it is unlikely to be abandoned as a framework for viewing women's experiences between 1861 and 1865." (239).  What types historiography do you think will appear in the future surrounding women's roles during the Civil War?  -ABratchie
 +
 +
In the introduction, McPherson and Cooper point out that there are still gaps in the historiography and that some issues need to be further studied, such as the role of religion in the Union and Confederacy.  Do you think that historians will be successful in addressing these gaps?  Why do you think that these topics have not had sufficient treatment?  -ABratchie

Revision as of 01:50, 17 March 2011