Difference between revisions of "329-2010--Week 9 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→Things the movie got right) |
(→Things the movie got right) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Funny, unlike Justine I thought there were maybe too many women in the movie. Not as main characters, but there seemed to be many in the background scenes, and even a fair number of children. Would there have been that many families in a town like Tombstone? -Mary Ann | Funny, unlike Justine I thought there were maybe too many women in the movie. Not as main characters, but there seemed to be many in the background scenes, and even a fair number of children. Would there have been that many families in a town like Tombstone? -Mary Ann | ||
| − | I think the film accurately portrayed the general setting of the west during it's earliest settling period. A town in the middle of nowhere, full of people both looking for a new start (Doc) and others looking for a place to escape the law (all the outlaws of the town). The set up of the town and the activities going on in and around it all seemed fairly accurate. There's cattle ranching, mining, prospecting, and lots of other aspects of the growing west represented in the film. - Victoria Y. | + | I think the film accurately portrayed the general setting of the west during it's earliest settling period. A town in the middle of nowhere, full of people both looking for a new start (Doc) and others looking for a place to escape the law (all the outlaws of the town). The set up of the town and the activities going on in and around it all seemed fairly accurate. There's cattle ranching, mining, prospecting, and lots of other aspects of the growing west represented in the film. They even threw in the sterotypical idea of a drunken Native American running a muck in the town. - Victoria Y. |
== Things the movie got wrong == | == Things the movie got wrong == | ||
