Difference between revisions of "329-2010--Week 4 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
(Things the movie got wrong)
(The movie as a primary source about the time/people who made it)
Line 50: Line 50:
  
 
According to the Web site Infoplease, several movies released in 2000 were, like "The Patriot," about the little guy standing up to forces larger than himself.  For instance, also in theaters that year were "Gladiator," "Erin Brokovich," and "The Perfect Storm."  "The Patriot" fit into that mold, in addition to also showing a strong, unified America.  That was an important point to make in that presidential election year when Gore beat Bush beat Gore beat Bush...  It's also significant that we had all just emerged from Y2K paranoia.  "IN A WORLD" where the might of technology seemed to have us all on the run, Americans needed to watch a bunch of yokels put a mighty nation on the run. (It was apparently Mel Gibson's year to support revolutions.  Remember "Chicken Run?" Here again, Mel is the indispensible individual who saves the day...dare I say he was the cock of the walk?) ---- Deborah S.
 
According to the Web site Infoplease, several movies released in 2000 were, like "The Patriot," about the little guy standing up to forces larger than himself.  For instance, also in theaters that year were "Gladiator," "Erin Brokovich," and "The Perfect Storm."  "The Patriot" fit into that mold, in addition to also showing a strong, unified America.  That was an important point to make in that presidential election year when Gore beat Bush beat Gore beat Bush...  It's also significant that we had all just emerged from Y2K paranoia.  "IN A WORLD" where the might of technology seemed to have us all on the run, Americans needed to watch a bunch of yokels put a mighty nation on the run. (It was apparently Mel Gibson's year to support revolutions.  Remember "Chicken Run?" Here again, Mel is the indispensible individual who saves the day...dare I say he was the cock of the walk?) ---- Deborah S.
 +
 +
To me this film seemed to define for its audience what it means to be a "true American" as well as suggest the revival of the American dream. When we first meet the protagonist his life is good and prosperous. He has a fully functional farm while only using about seven "slaves", children, and respect in the community. Yet when trouble arises, he slinks back from it due to past experiences with violence. Still when the chips are down he pushes through, and fights for what the film says is the true American spirit even though he has lost two sons and turned the last two into mild-sociopaths (evident when one says, "I'm glad I killed [those men]."). After some thought I began to see Mel Gibson's character as an analogy of America itself: mostly profitable, scared from past experiences, and lacking in overall national spirit. What this film says about early 2000 America then is that the American dream-the idea of getting more via sacrifice and hard-work-needed a wake up call. This view went over fairly well with public at the time, however in my own experience with the film interests spiked after the attacks of 9/11. As Deborah said in her post the American movie audiences of 2000 obviously were enjoying rooting for the little man, and <em>The Patriot</em> gave them just that and then some. -Isaac Whalen
  
 
== Comments on the reading versus the movie ==
 
== Comments on the reading versus the movie ==

Revision as of 00:33, 16 September 2010