Difference between revisions of "329-2010--Week 3 Questions/Comments"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
(The movie as a primary source about the time/people who made it)
(Questions asked in class)
Line 64: Line 64:
 
I found it disturbing how the Native Americans were portrayed either as blood-thirsty fiends who consistently looked out for their own interests,like Magua, or were "the good guys" who backed up the white men and selflessly pursued the cause, such as Hawkeye and his family. Is there no middle ground here? It seems that the Native Americans who actually lived during the conflict were haphazardly drawn into it by Europeans demanding they choose a side. Magua and Hawkeye are both depicted as being wholly devoted to the conflict. It was also mentioned during lecture that the Native Americans abandoned the French midway into the war. This only reinforces the point that Native Americans did not really want to engage in this war, and thus would not completely devote themselves to it.  I found the movie to be misleading in accurately portraying this point. --Anna Holman
 
I found it disturbing how the Native Americans were portrayed either as blood-thirsty fiends who consistently looked out for their own interests,like Magua, or were "the good guys" who backed up the white men and selflessly pursued the cause, such as Hawkeye and his family. Is there no middle ground here? It seems that the Native Americans who actually lived during the conflict were haphazardly drawn into it by Europeans demanding they choose a side. Magua and Hawkeye are both depicted as being wholly devoted to the conflict. It was also mentioned during lecture that the Native Americans abandoned the French midway into the war. This only reinforces the point that Native Americans did not really want to engage in this war, and thus would not completely devote themselves to it.  I found the movie to be misleading in accurately portraying this point. --Anna Holman
  
 +
I definitely agree with Anna in that I don't think the movie really portrayed the sense that most Native Americans felt they were caught in the middle rather than being fully devoted to one side or another as most seemed to be in the film. Many of the readings show the Indians as confused and betrayed by both the English's and the French's concept of friendship and alliance. Those that do join the war do so because they want protection for their people and enough food and land to survive, not because of any deep rooted allegiance to the causes the Europeans are fighting for. -Mary Ann
  
 
Samantha W. mentions several points that I noticed about the narrow-mindedness of the British officers.  Duncan's character in particular is a good example of a man who cannot adjust his worldview.  To him, it is incomprehensible that a British subject would refuse to fight, and equally incomprehensible that a British officer would lie.  After he has himself lied about what he saw at the cabin, he tells Cora that when they return to England nothing that has happened "over here" will matter at all.  For him, the New World does not fit into neat categories and he cannot comprehend it, therefore it is as insubstantial as a dream.  Really, for him, it is as frightening and disorienting as a nightmare. I can easily believe that many real people felt that way. --- Deborah S.
 
Samantha W. mentions several points that I noticed about the narrow-mindedness of the British officers.  Duncan's character in particular is a good example of a man who cannot adjust his worldview.  To him, it is incomprehensible that a British subject would refuse to fight, and equally incomprehensible that a British officer would lie.  After he has himself lied about what he saw at the cabin, he tells Cora that when they return to England nothing that has happened "over here" will matter at all.  For him, the New World does not fit into neat categories and he cannot comprehend it, therefore it is as insubstantial as a dream.  Really, for him, it is as frightening and disorienting as a nightmare. I can easily believe that many real people felt that way. --- Deborah S.

Revision as of 01:00, 9 September 2010