Difference between revisions of "329-2010--Week 2 Questions/Comments"

Yes, Disney's Pocahontas is historically inaccurate-not to mention that '''basic laws of physics are also suspended (i.e. diving off an water and living ect.).''' Yet what I find more interesting is '''what Toplin talked about in his work, what historians can learn about the socitety that made the film.''' More specifically, what can we learn by looking at what was left in the film despite its inaccuracies. The first thing that struck me was '''Disney portrayal of the [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=define%3A+Noble+savage&aq=0&aqi=l1g1&aql=&oq=noble+savage+def&gs_rfai=C8p770n5-TLvOD5aCywSwhb1oAAAAqgQFT9CIA1w&pbx=1 noble savage] idea through out the film'''. In the work there is almost constant imagery suggesting that the Native Americans are more in-tune with god, nature, and each other simply because they lack what the colonists have, advanced technology. The question is then, what  outstanding events might have made the filmmakers more likely to put this idea in the film (I'm not arguing its wrong or right I'm looking at this objectively). In 1995 the begins of the Free Tibet movement were starting possibly generating a cultural desire to oppose more militaristic forces. Also, the film spends a lot of time attempting to educate its viewers about the negative connotations with using the word "savage." This prompted one of the most interesting historical inaccuracies I noticed, which is the John Smith himself attempts to dissuade his fellow colonists form using the word "savage", while in his memoirs make free use of this word. So, '''I believe the correct approach to viewing this film is the one Toplin outlines, by treating it as a primary source on the times that created it.''' Disney films are notorious for slipping in subliminal messaging, or Hollywoodizing stroies. If we go into the film knowing this we can learn much about modern history, -Isaac Whalen

Yes, Disney's Pocahontas is historically inaccurate-not to mention that '''basic laws of physics are also suspended (i.e. diving off an water and living ect.).''' Yet what I find more interesting is '''what Toplin talked about in his work, what historians can learn about the socitety that made the film.''' More specifically, what can we learn by looking at what was left in the film despite its inaccuracies. The first thing that struck me was '''Disney portrayal of the [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=define%3A+Noble+savage&aq=0&aqi=l1g1&aql=&oq=noble+savage+def&gs_rfai=C8p770n5-TLvOD5aCywSwhb1oAAAAqgQFT9CIA1w&pbx=1 noble savage] idea through out the film'''. In the work there is almost constant imagery suggesting that the Native Americans are more in-tune with god, nature, and each other simply because they lack what the colonists have, advanced technology. The question is then, what  outstanding events might have made the filmmakers more likely to put this idea in the film (I'm not arguing its wrong or right I'm looking at this objectively). In 1995 the begins of the Free Tibet movement were starting possibly generating a cultural desire to oppose more militaristic forces. Also, the film spends a lot of time attempting to educate its viewers about the negative connotations with using the word "savage." This prompted one of the most interesting historical inaccuracies I noticed, which is the John Smith himself attempts to dissuade his fellow colonists form using the word "savage", while in his memoirs make free use of this word. So, '''I believe the correct approach to viewing this film is the one Toplin outlines, by treating it as a primary source on the times that created it.''' Disney films are notorious for slipping in subliminal messaging, or Hollywoodizing stroies. If we go into the film knowing this we can learn much about modern history, -Isaac Whalen

== General comments for Pocahontas ==  

== General comments for Pocahontas ==