Difference between revisions of "Week 1 Questions/Comments-327 09"

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131

Revision as of 01:45, 27 August 2009 (view source) Mturner (Talk | contribs) m (→‎Gisela Bock's "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History") ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:48, 27 August 2009 (view source) Shauser (Talk | contribs) (→‎Antonia Castañeda’s“Women of Color and the Rewriting of Western History”) Newer edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	== Antonia Castañeda’s“Women of Color and the Rewriting of Western History” ==		== Antonia Castañeda’s“Women of Color and the Rewriting of Western History” ==
		+
		+	The last sentence of this essay sums up her argument well. "The study of women of color requires us to reexamine, challenge, and change those structures. Only then will we decolonize western history." Castañeda points out how women's history can easily fall into the same error as "traditional" history does by focusing on one specific sub-group within women's history, in this case middle-class white women. Studying women of color places the historian at intersect that challenges both gender and racial studies. --[[User:Shauser|Shauser]] 19:48, 26 August 2009 (MDT)
	== Gisela Bock's "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History" ==		== Gisela Bock's "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History" ==

---

Revision as of 01:48, 27 August 2009