Difference between revisions of "Week 1 Questions/Comments-327 09"

From McClurken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Deprecated: Optional parameter $attribs declared before required parameter $contents is implicitly treated as a required parameter in /home/umwhisto/public_html/mcclurken/wiki/includes/Xml.php on line 131
(Leslie Alexander, “Rethinking the Position of Black Women in American Women’s History”)
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 
The piece on "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History," I found most interesting.  There are obvious gender difference such as women can have babies and men cannot.  But it is interesting because the roles of women and men have changed.  I think that each individual is different and their expectations change for themselves and how they are viewed by those around them like family and society as a whole.  -Marsha Himes
 
The piece on "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History," I found most interesting.  There are obvious gender difference such as women can have babies and men cannot.  But it is interesting because the roles of women and men have changed.  I think that each individual is different and their expectations change for themselves and how they are viewed by those around them like family and society as a whole.  -Marsha Himes
 +
 +
In "Challenging Dichotomies in Women's History" Gisela Block writes about nature verses culture. I found it interesting that the activities of men were considered cultural and activities of women were natural. "Nature" in the context it was used undervalues the work women did. It just shows how far women have come since the 1970's. -LeAnn Taggart
  
 
Gisela Bock's essay made me realize how intricate the study of women's history really is. Men and women are different in many ways including "working" at home or at the office and whether taking care of the family is considered work. The terms "sex" and "gender" are also scrutinized for one relates more to motherhood and being able to give birth than the other. I thought the dichotomies and the essay were interesting.  -Amy Van Ness
 
Gisela Bock's essay made me realize how intricate the study of women's history really is. Men and women are different in many ways including "working" at home or at the office and whether taking care of the family is considered work. The terms "sex" and "gender" are also scrutinized for one relates more to motherhood and being able to give birth than the other. I thought the dichotomies and the essay were interesting.  -Amy Van Ness
  
 
   I found the essay about Women of Color and the rewriting of Western History very interesting for a couple of reasons.  I thought that women of all races collaborated with one another during the Women’s movements of the 1960’s and 1970’s.  As  Castandeda states there were two different movements one being the women’s liberation movement and the second one being the third-world liberation movements.  Women of color had a more difficult time obtaining equal rights than white middle class women because not only did they have to deal with the question of gender but also with race. -Nick Jesionka
 
   I found the essay about Women of Color and the rewriting of Western History very interesting for a couple of reasons.  I thought that women of all races collaborated with one another during the Women’s movements of the 1960’s and 1970’s.  As  Castandeda states there were two different movements one being the women’s liberation movement and the second one being the third-world liberation movements.  Women of color had a more difficult time obtaining equal rights than white middle class women because not only did they have to deal with the question of gender but also with race. -Nick Jesionka

Revision as of 23:32, 26 August 2009