Difference between revisions of "329--Week 13 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→2 Film's relationship to current scholarship or to primary sources from the time) |
(→5 Other movies/questions of style/framing/storyline) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
That makes sense for the "Vietnam Section" I guess we can call it, but for the entire movie? It didn't really seem to make sense and I don't know if it was a wise choice on their part (if it was a conscious decision) to try to do that. Something just doesn't seem to add up. But the choppiness really did work with the war scenes because you did get a sense of confusion and chaos of the situations these guys were in. -Kelly Wuyscik | That makes sense for the "Vietnam Section" I guess we can call it, but for the entire movie? It didn't really seem to make sense and I don't know if it was a wise choice on their part (if it was a conscious decision) to try to do that. Something just doesn't seem to add up. But the choppiness really did work with the war scenes because you did get a sense of confusion and chaos of the situations these guys were in. -Kelly Wuyscik | ||
| + | |||
| + | In response to Kelly's response - I was thinking psychologically it works for the whole movie. I am NOT saying that I enjoyed it as a film viewer, but I can see why it might have been done that way. - Elle | ||
== 6 Overall == | == 6 Overall == | ||
