Difference between revisions of "328--Week 9 Questions/Comments"
From McClurken Wiki
(→Meridel Lesueur, "Despair of Unemployed Women") |
(→All Eleanor Roosevelt readings) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''(McClurken don't make fun of me to much in class, I like to be there when i am made fun of save a little for Tuesday).''' | '''(McClurken don't make fun of me to much in class, I like to be there when i am made fun of save a little for Tuesday).''' | ||
| + | For me the most interesting letter to Eleanor Roosevelt was the second one. The woman thanked Roosevelt for her reply to the last letter, but then said she did not need charity just a loan, even sending in collateral she claimed was valuable. However, what bothers me here is not the fact that the first lady could not possibly begin to make individual loans to people, but the size of this woman's ego or pride. She claimed she gave up her rings which held the highest emotional value to her, this is not true. What holds the highest value in this woman's life is clearly her ability to save face, her pride. If she was truly desperate, and in such great need that she would ask a loan from a stranger, she should be willing to give up her greatest asset; that of her ego, and take the charity that the government has set up for her. I have noticed the same trend more subtly throughout the rest of the readings, what is causing this? Is it a few isolated cases or does this pride fit in with the overall atttidue of the day, or somehow into the middle class ideals we have talked so extensively about? --- Landon Davis | ||
== Meridel Lesueur, "Despair of Unemployed Women" == | == Meridel Lesueur, "Despair of Unemployed Women" == | ||
